When I talk with a group of non-GF people about our business, I usually open with the question of, “How would you feel if one of your next 100 meals was going to contain a low grade of food poison? It may make you ill for a day, for a week or increase your likelihood of several varieties of cancer. It may effect you right away, or it may take time to activate. What is it worth to you to avoid that meal?” This is what we encounter each and every day. It is a minefield.
Imagine that you’ve got to walk across a field. Are there mines? How do we avoid them?
It depends a little about where we are. If we’re in a former war zone, then yes there may be mines. So, location matters. There are certain grocery store aisles where you are going to find gluten. There are certain restaurants that are going to have gluten in every product. You’ve got to know the ground to know the proper level of prudence. If we start to map out locations, then we can try and understand how much trouble we are in from the outset, and what locations we should flat out avoid.
What kinds of mines are we looking for? Let’s say it is a particularly devious mine that is both anti-personnel and anti-armor. For good measure, let’s say that some of them are simply one or the other.
If we’ve got a test that shows the anti-personnel mines, do we know that we are safe for the anti-armor mines? Vice-versa? It’s important to note that many of the commercial methods used to test for ‘gluten’ are actually testing for one of the protein sub-components, gliadin or glutenin. These tests are okay if we know that these two proteins are always bound together, but we know for a fact that this is not always the case. When we say something is gluten free, or that it does not have gluten, it is important that we present ourselves with an appropriate audit trail so we can know exactly how we know what we know.
Let’s say that we’ve got our minefield identified and that we have gone in and swept the mines. (A favorite Youtube clip is here.) Is it still a minefield? No, but it isn’t a “not-minefield” and pronouncing the area safe may be a bit premature. Rather, what we probably should do is proclaim that it was previously a mine field and state clearly the process we used to clean the minefield up. What if our process only got rid of anti-personnel mines? What if we detonated all of the mines, but there was still shrapnel in the soil? It may be safe to cross with heavy boots, but we wouldn’t want to play a barefoot soccer game, would we?
This last point is an important one. Proclaiming something ‘safe’ if it had dangerous precursors is a tricky endeavor. Imagine that the detonator caps in the mines survived. The mines are now much less dangerous, but the mine subcomponents are now smaller and still potentially harmful. Food processing technologies, such as hydrolysis, may change the gluten such that is difficult to measure, but the protein subcomponents may still be creating a biological reaction that is detrimental to our health.
Getting rid of mines is an extremely difficult proposition. So difficult that the best way to deal with mines is to prevent them from being put down. Identifying products that have a gluten precursor is an important part of understanding product safety for the gluten free population.